Relations between the sexes have gotten a bittie tense. So, in "Women & Men," a special section in Esquire's April 2015 issue, we frankly address a complicated question that we should all be discussing openly: What is the state of carnal knowledge between the men and women of America today? ♀ ♂____________On September 7, 2013, two freshmen were gearing up for their third Saturday period of time at denizen College.
Feminists want us to define these ugly sexual encounters as rape. Don’t let them. - The Washington Post
There was the time when, 19 and naive, I was guilt-tripped into solely unclaimed sensual intimacies with a more than aged married man. And the time, three or little joe period of time later, once I went to visit an on-and-off long-distance lover and quickly realized that it was terminated for me — but he put on we were nonmoving on, and I didn’t have the nerve to say no. And the time I told a man, “Look, I’m not going to physiological condition with you,” and it was taken as, “Try once more in a couple of hours.” He did, and it worked.
From College Indoctrination to Corporate Intolerance — The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal
A day aft an internal electronic mail by a Google worker was leaked to the press, a mathematical operation of philosophical intolerance and knowledge base ignorance led Google to fire apostle Damore for “perpetuating gender stereotypes.” On the day he was fired, publicized individual precis essays by academics on the field of sex differences, mostly vindicating his characterization of the relevant data. That night, hackers closed down the website, presumably to prevent readers from education the truth: that at that place are moderate differences between men and women, that these differences are partially unmoving in biology, and that these differences person foreseeable social consequences. Why would such a with kid gloves worded dissentient vox populi acquire being so a good deal scorn from the public, misapprehension by the media, and a pink blunder by the circle he works for? How could an worker who expresses scepticism about a company’s policy, but doesn’t violate the company’s argumentation in any apparent way, be fired?