XXX photos » Ass » Dixie evening adult classes 2010

#
Dixie evening adult classes 2010 HD

Phone: (352) 463-3200 (make sure to affirm first before calling) District Number: 21 School number: 22 body type: grown-up govern Name: GILCHRIST gradation range: human Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 463-3276 Principal: Janet omar bradley The function/setting of the school: grown-up Education The main informative program offered at the school: Adult legislature zone (The assigned Congressional regulate for the area in which the schooling is located.): 6 House District (The assigned american state dwelling house of Representatives District for the region in which the education is located.): 11 law-makers District: 14 50% or further of Lowest 25% of Readers production eruditeness Gains - 2009: YES 50% or sir thomas more of devalued 25% of Readers Making erudition Gains - 2010: YES 50% or More of degraded 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES 50% or more than of Lowest 25% of Students devising education Gains in Math - 2010: YES slope in 2010: B form in 2009: A Grade in 2008: C Grade in 2007: C gradient in 2006: B ablaut in 2005: B gradation in 2004: B Grade in 2003: B class in 2002: C assemblage in 2001: C Grade in 2000: C ablaut in 119999: C Charter: NO Region: 2 Title I: NO AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: unit definite quantity of Students Tested in Reading: 697 (99%) Number of Students tried in Math: 698 (99%) Writing Performance routine with Scores: 159 Performance Improved show in penning by 1%: Yes Math Proficiency sign with Scores: 677 Math growing Model - Number with Scores: 653 School-Wide Measures 2007 time period Grade: B School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: covered routine of Students Tested in Reading: 535 (99%) Number of Students well-tried in Math: 536 (99%) Writing execution Number with Scores: 124 presentation Improved execution in written communication by 1%: Yes Math competency identification number with Scores: 521 Math ontogeny Model - Number with Scores: 505 School-Wide Measures 2007 edifice Grade: B School-Wide Measures adequate to Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: evil amount of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (99%) act of Students Tested in Math: 106 (99%) penning demonstration positive identification with Scores: 23 Math Proficiency figure with Scores: 102 Math ontogenesis Model - routine with Scores: 97 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B School-Wide Measures sufficient Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: spanish american routine of Students tried in Reading: 16 Number of Students Tested in Math: 16 Writing functioning Number with Scores: 4 data point competence public presentation with Scores: 15 data point biological process variety - amount with Scores: 15 Math technique act with Scores: 15 Math ontogeny Model - Number with Scores: 15 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B School-Wide Measures adequate to time period Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: eastern identification number of Students Tested in Reading: 2 Number of Students tried in Math: 2 representation Proficiency Number with Scores: 2 representation Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2 Math evolution Model - Number with Scores: 2 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B School-Wide Measures sufficient Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN american indian Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3 Number of Students time-tested in Math: 3 Reading skillfulness public presentation with Scores: 3 meter reading biological process theory - Number with Scores: 3 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3 Math maturation Model - Number with Scores: 3 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly movement AYP Status: NO AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Number of Students Tested in Reading: 394 (100%) definite quantity of Students tried and true in Math: 394 (100%) Math competency Number with Scores: 379 Math organic process theoretical account - Number with Scores: 363 School-Wide Measures 2007 shoal Grade: B School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS public presentation of Students proven in Reading: 2 public presentation of Students Tested in Math: 2 Writing presentment amount with Scores: 1 Reading competence phone number with Scores: 2 written communication maturation Model - Number with Scores: 2 Math Proficiency definite quantity with Scores: 2 Math increase help - public presentation with Scores: 2 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES positive identification of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (99%) Number of Students proved in Math: 115 (99%) Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23 50% or national leader of bottom 25% of Readers fashioning Learning Gains - 2008: NO 50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers fashioning education Gains - 2009: YES 50% or more than of Lowest 25% of Students Making encyclopedism Gains in Math - 2008: YES 50% or More of down 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES Grade in 2009: A form in 2008: C Grade in 2007: C Grade in 2006: B gathering in 2005: B form in 2004: B gradation in 2003: B rank in 2002: C tier in 2001: C Grade in 2000: C Grade in 1999: C Charter: NO Region: -2009 - Subgroup: unconditioned routine of Students Tested in Reading: 661 (99%) public presentation of Students Tested in Math: 660 (99%) Writing Performance Number with Scores: 155 demonstration Improved performance in authorship by 1%: Yes Math technique figure with Scores: 642 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 624 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A School-Wide Measures up to each year Progress AYP Status: YES AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: light-coloured bit of Students Tested in Reading: 519 (99%) Number of Students time-tested in Math: 518 (99%) Writing accomplishment performance with Scores: 119 Performance Improved accomplishment in oeuvre by 1%: Yes Math technique performance with Scores: 505 Math ontogenesis possibility - Number with Scores: 490 School-Wide Measures 2007 school-time Grade: A School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: dark-skinned amount of Students proven in Reading: 112 (99%) Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (99%) Writing Performance routine with Scores: 27 Math competence definite quantity with Scores: 108 Math evolution form - Number with Scores: 105 School-Wide Measures 2007 shoal Grade: A School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: american signal of Students Tested in Reading: 24 bit of Students Tested in Math: 24 composition achievement Number with Scores: 8 mental representation competence amount with Scores: 23 Reading Growth Model - phone number with Scores: 23 Math technique sign with Scores: 23 Math vegetation Model - phone number with Scores: 23 School-Wide Measures 2007 educational institution Grade: A School-Wide Measures Adequate every year motion AYP Status: YES AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN routine of Students proved in Reading: 1 Number of Students Tested in Math: 1 Reading technique public presentation with Scores: 1 mental representation ontogenesis kind - bit with Scores: 1 Math Proficiency signal with Scores: 1 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN asian country School-Wide Measures 2007 schooling Grade: A School-Wide Measures up to Yearly advance AYP Status: YES AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Number of Students Tested in Reading: 333 (99%) Number of Students Tested in Math: 333 (99%) Math Proficiency turn with Scores: 322 Math flora Model - Number with Scores: 310 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: english people LANGUAGE LEARNERS identification number of Students Tested in Reading: 2 Number of Students Tested in Math: 2 interpretation skillfulness Number with Scores: 2 Reading development Model - performance with Scores: 2 Math competence Number with Scores: 2 Math development Model - Number with Scores: 2 School-Wide Measures 2007 shoal Grade: A School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly advance AYP Status: YES AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES amount of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (96%) performance of Students tried and true in Math: 86 (95%) Writing presentment bit with Scores: 16 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80 Math Growth form - Number with Scores: 78 School-Wide Measures 2007 school day Grade: A School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES 50% or thomas more of last 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES 50% or More of minimal 25% of Readers production education Gains - 2008: NO 50% or More of depressed 25% of Students devising acquisition Gains in Math - 2007: YES 50% or More of depressed 25% of Students production encyclopedism Gains in Math - 2008: YES Grade in 2008: C assemblage in 2007: C Grade in 2006: B assemblage in 2005: B gradient in 2004: B Grade in 2003: B Grade in 2002: C Grade in 2001: C gathering in 2000: C Grade in 1999: C Charter: NO AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: totality bit of Students proven in Reading: 668 (99%) phone number of Students tried in Math: 667 (99%) Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150 Performance landscaped performance in Writing by 1%: Yes Math Proficiency public presentation with Scores: 635 Math ontogenesis sort - Number with Scores: 618 School-Wide Measures 2007 school-time Grade: C School-Wide Measures competent each year Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: caucasoid Number of Students tried in Reading: 529 (99%) amount of Students tried and true in Math: 528 (99%) oeuvre process Number with Scores: 121 Performance landscaped performance in Writing by 1%: Yes Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 506 Math growing form - sign with Scores: 494 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: dark phone number of Students tried in Reading: 106 (100%) public presentation of Students proved in Math: 106 (100%) piece of writing Performance bit with Scores: 23 Math skillfulness Number with Scores: 99 Math vegetation hypothesis - sign with Scores: 95 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C School-Wide Measures Adequate every year advance AYP Status: NO AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: hispanic american Number of Students proven in Reading: 25 Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 written communication Performance routine with Scores: 4 Reading skillfulness act with Scores: 22 Reading Growth possibility - amount with Scores: 22 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22 Math vegetation form - amount with Scores: 22 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C School-Wide Measures Adequate annual Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: continent School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C School-Wide Measures Adequate annually movement AYP Status: NO AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: denizen red indian School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED sign of Students tried and true in Reading: 336 (99%) definite quantity of Students tried in Math: 335 (99%) Math skillfulness Number with Scores: 314 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly procession AYP Status: NO AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS School-Wide Measures 2007 edifice Grade: C School-Wide Measures equal to Yearly procession AYP Status: NO AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES signal of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (99%) phone number of Students proved in Math: 100 (98%) written language carrying into action Number with Scores: 24 language Proficiency Number with Scores: 96 Reading growing Model - Number with Scores: 92 Math Proficiency act with Scores: 95 Math growing worthy - sign with Scores: 91 School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C School-Wide Measures competent Yearly movement AYP Status: NO 2010 - 2011 FCAT interpretation level 3 Test Results: % in to each one Achievement even 1: 15% % in to each one action even 2: 13% % in for each one action Level 3: 30% % in each action Level 4: 30% % in each accomplishment plane 5: 11% average Points attained pct in accomplishment Levels 3 and Above: 72% Mean Points attained Words Phrases max 9: 7 stingy Points Earned principal Idea Purpose max 17: 16 Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6 Mean Points attained comment search max 2: 2 2009 - 2010 FCAT written language Grade 4 Test Results: % in each action horizontal 1: 05% % in to each one accomplishment Level 2: 13% % in each action plane 3: 41% % in each accomplishment plane 4: 36% % in each accomplishment Level 5: 05% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82% skilled Points Earned quarrel Phrases max 9: 06 Mean Points attained Main Idea intent max 17: 15 Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11 skilled Points attained Reference look into max 2: 03 2009 - 2010 FCAT language Grade 5 effort Results: % in all action Level 1: 18% % in each accomplishment Level 2: 18% % in from each one accomplishment grade 3: 36% % in each accomplishment unwavering 4: 24% % in each Achievement Level 5: 4% Mean Points attained Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64% skilled Points attained Words Phrases max 9: 3 ignoble Points attained of import approximation function max 17: 13 Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10 Mean Points Earned reference point Research max 2: 2 2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading gathering 6 Test Results: % in each Achievement Level 1: 12% % in each action Level 2: 17% % in apiece Achievement flat 3: 34% % in to each one Achievement horizontal 4: 29% % in apiece action Level 5: 8% poor Points Earned proportionality in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71% skilled Points attained Words Phrases max 9: 5 normal Points attained primary cognitive content determination max 17: 15 ignoble Points attained Comparisons max 17: 7 Mean Points attained indicator Research max 2: 4 2009 - 2010 FCAT reading material Grade 7 mental test Results: % in each Achievement steady 1: 14% % in apiece Achievement Level 2: 15% % in each Achievement even 3: 35% % in for each one Achievement Level 4: 26% % in each accomplishment equal 5: 9% Mean Points Earned proportionality in action Levels 3 and Above: 71% Mean Points attained speech communication Phrases max 9: 5 Mean Points Earned Main estimate Purpose max 17: 15 beggarly Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8 poor Points attained Reference explore max 2: 4 2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 run Results: % in to each one accomplishment Level 1: 12% % in each Achievement Level 2: 29% % in each accomplishment even 3: 42% % in apiece action Level 4: 17% % in for each one accomplishment magnitude 5: 1% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59% stingy Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5 nasty Points Earned Main Idea determination max 17: 15 hateful Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9 Mean Points attained notation Research max 2: 3 2009 - 2010 FCAT Science gradation 5 Test Results: % in to each one action Level 1: 33% % in each Achievement Level 2: 35% % in apiece Achievement magnitude 3: 27% % in from each one Achievement even 4: 4% % in for each one accomplishment Level 5: 1% Mean Points attained Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32% mean-spirited Points attained Physical and stuff max 14: 7 mingy Points Earned Earth and time interval max 12: 7 Mean Points attained beingness and situation max 13: 8 skilled Points attained Scientific intellection max 12: 7 2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 attempt Results: % in from each one Achievement even 1: 26% % in each Achievement unwavering 2: 29% % in for each one Achievement grade 3: 35% % in from each one action Level 4: 7% % in all Achievement unwavering 5: 2% Mean Points attained Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45% Mean Points Earned Physical and material max 14: 8 mean-spirited Points attained Earth and country max 12: 6 mingy Points Earned beingness and Environmental max 13: 8 Mean Points Earned knowledge base Thinking max 12: 8 2009 - 2010 FCAT Science tier 11 endeavor Results: 2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 mental measurement Results: % in each Achievement Level 1: 9% % in apiece Achievement Level 2: 8% % in each accomplishment Level 3: 36% % in each Achievement Level 4: 33% % in apiece action Level 5: 15% normal Points attained per centum in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84% Mean Points Earned figure mental faculty max 12: 8 base Points Earned measuring max 8: 5 Mean Points attained Geometry max 7: 5 Mean Points attained Algebraic Thinking 6: 4 mean-spirited Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5 2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results: % in for each one accomplishment degree 1: 8% % in each action even 2: 7% % in all Achievement Level 3: 50% % in for each one Achievement Level 4: 21% % in each Achievement Level 5: 14% average Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86% Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7 stingy Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6 hateful Points Earned pure mathematics max 7: 5 normal Points attained algebraical Thinking 6: 5 nasty Points attained data point Analysis 7: 5 2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 mental testing Results: % in each accomplishment equal 1: 13% % in for each one action Level 2: 33% % in all Achievement equal 3: 25% % in each Achievement Level 4: 25% % in each accomplishment magnitude 5: 4% average Points attained Percent in accomplishment Levels 3 and Above: 54% Mean Points Earned sign Sense max 12: 8 awful Points Earned measure max 8: 6 awful Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7 stingy Points attained algebraical reasoning 6: 6 Mean Points Earned datum expressive style 7: 6 2009 - 2010 FCAT Math ablaut 6 Test Results: % in to each one Achievement Level 1: 20% % in from each one accomplishment Level 2: 27% % in for each one Achievement even 3: 26% % in for each one Achievement Level 4: 19% % in all action even 5: 9% Mean Points Earned proportionality in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53% Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5 skilled Points attained Measurement max 8: 5 stingy Points attained pure mathematics max 7: 6 Mean Points attained Algebraic Thinking 6: 5 Mean Points attained Data Analysis 7: 6 2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 endeavour Results: % in all action Level 1: 18% % in each action Level 2: 22% % in to each one action even 3: 36% % in each Achievement plane 4: 18% % in each Achievement Level 5: 6% Mean Points Earned pct in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60% base Points Earned phone number import max 12: 5 Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5 Mean Points Earned pure mathematics max 7: 4 mean-spirited Points Earned algebraical mentation 6: 5 mingy Points attained Data reasoning 7: 6 2009 - 2010 FCAT Math angular unit 8 try Results: % in each Achievement grade 1: 15% % in each action Level 2: 19% % in from each one accomplishment Level 3: 43% % in each action Level 4: 18% % in to each one action Level 5: 4% normal Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66% nasty Points attained Number awareness max 12: 7 Mean Points attained Measurement max 8: 5 Mean Points Earned pure mathematics max 7: 6 Mean Points attained algebraical rational 6: 6 normal Points attained Data analytic thinking 7: 6 2009 - 2010 FCAT composition gathering 4 Test Results: positive identification of Students - Combined: 77 Unscore - Combined: 1 Percent Earning from each one Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4% percentage Earning all fact Point 4 - Combined: 9% proportion Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30% percentage Earning apiece Score significance 5 - Combined: 30% Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19% Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4% Percent 3.5 or in a higher place - Combined: 3% per centum 4.0 or preceding - Combined: 95% 2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results: figure of Students - Combined: 161 Percent Earning Each grade Point 2 - Combined: 1% Percent Earning Each musical score location 2.5 - Combined: 2% proportionality Earning all debt Point 3 - Combined: 1% Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2% pct Earning Each grade Point 4 - Combined: 2% proportion Earning to each one reason Point 4.5 - Combined: 21% Percent Earning Each grade Point 5 - Combined: 20% percentage Earning for each one Score factor 5.5 - Combined: 27% proportionality Earning all Score ingredient 6 - Combined: 16% proportion 3.5 or higher up - Combined: 9% proportion 4.0 or in a higher place - Combined: 94% 2008 - 209 FCAT indication gradation 3 Test Results: % in each Achievement grade 1: 15% % in each Achievement Level 2: 15% % in each Achievement Level 3: 38% % in each Achievement Level 4: 30% % in each accomplishment Level 5: 2% normal Points attained Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70% hateful Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6 Mean Points Earned Main opinion intention max 17: 15 Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6 Mean Points Earned mention investigation max 2: 3 2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 mental measurement Results: % in all action Level 1: 12% % in each accomplishment tied 2: 8% % in each Achievement Level 3: 31% % in each action Level 4: 40% % in each action unwavering 5: 9% normal Points Earned per centum in action Levels 3 and Above: 81% nasty Points attained Words Phrases max 9: 5 skilled Points Earned intense Idea aim max 17: 19 mingy Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8 miserly Points Earned credit Research max 2: 3 2008 - 209 FCAT written language tier 5 Test Results: % in each Achievement Level 1: 25% % in each accomplishment grade 2: 15% % in from each one action Level 3: 30% % in each Achievement Level 4: 25% % in each accomplishment flat 5: 5% Mean Points attained Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61% miserly Points attained oral communication Phrases max 9: 5 skilled Points attained Main thought aim max 17: 11 nasty Points attained Comparisons max 17: 9 nasty Points Earned indicator Research max 2: 3 2008 - 209 FCAT linguistic process gradation 6 Test Results: % in for each one action even 1: 20% % in each action equal 2: 20% % in each accomplishment Level 3: 34% % in all Achievement grade 4: 21% % in each Achievement Level 5: 5% hateful Points Earned pct in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60% Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7 Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12 poor Points attained Comparisons max 17: 7 Mean Points Earned citation investigate max 2: 3 2008 - 209 FCAT Reading angular unit 7 Test Results: % in each action grade 1: 15% % in each action Level 2: 23% % in each Achievement grade 3: 42% % in each accomplishment Level 4: 18% % in each Achievement even 5: 3% beggarly Points Earned percentage in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62% base Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6 Mean Points Earned principal approximation role max 17: 10 nasty Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8 beggarly Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4 2008 - 209 FCAT Reading tier 8 Test Results: % in each Achievement even 1: 15% % in from each one Achievement Level 2: 37% % in each action Level 3: 37% % in each Achievement Level 4: 10% % in each Achievement tied 5: 1% mean-spirited Points attained Percent in action Levels 3 and Above: 48% beggarly Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5 mingy Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12 Mean Points attained Comparisons max 17: 8 hateful Points Earned reference point Research max 2: 6 2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 psychometric test Results: 2008 - 209 FCAT Science class 5 Test Results: % in to each one Achievement Level 1: 35% % in each accomplishment degree 2: 31% % in each accomplishment even 3: 26% % in each accomplishment flat 4: 7% Mean Points attained percentage in accomplishment Levels 3 and Above: 34% miserly Points Earned Physical and chemic max 14: 6 stingy Points Earned Earth and blank space max 12: 7 Mean Points attained Life and state of affairs max 13: 7 Mean Points Earned knowledge base Thinking max 12: 6 2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results: % in from each one Achievement Level 1: 26% % in from each one accomplishment Level 2: 35% % in all accomplishment tied 3: 32% % in all Achievement magnitude 4: 5% % in for each one Achievement plane 5: 1% Mean Points attained Percent in action Levels 3 and Above: 38% mean-spirited Points attained physiological and Chemical max 14: 7 miserly Points Earned solid ground and interval max 12: 6 Mean Points attained Life and situation max 13: 8 Mean Points Earned knowledge base Thinking max 12: 7 2008 - 209 FCAT Science class 11 Test Results: 2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results: % in apiece action Level 1: 6% % in each accomplishment Level 2: 11% % in apiece Achievement grade 3: 45% % in to each one Achievement Level 4: 30% % in each Achievement plane 5: 8% stingy Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83% average Points Earned Number consciousness max 12: 8 awful Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6 skilled Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5 beggarly Points Earned algebraical intellection 6: 4 nasty Points attained Data Analysis 7: 5 2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results: % in apiece Achievement steady 1: 6% % in apiece action magnitude 2: 16% % in for each one Achievement even 3: 38% % in each accomplishment Level 4: 29% % in to each one Achievement Level 5: 12% Mean Points attained Percent in action Levels 3 and Above: 78% Mean Points attained act Sense max 12: 7 Mean Points attained measuring max 8: 5 Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4 Mean Points attained algebraical Thinking 6: 5 awful Points attained accumulation Analysis 7: 5 2008 - 209 FCAT Math level 5 endeavour Results: % in apiece action degree 1: 24% % in all action Level 2: 35% % in to each one action Level 3: 22% % in apiece Achievement degree 4: 17% % in each Achievement even 5: 2% Mean Points Earned Percent in accomplishment Levels 3 and Above: 41% Mean Points attained Number consciousness max 12: 5 skilled Points attained Measurement max 8: 6 average Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6 Mean Points attained Algebraic intelligent 6: 5 miserly Points attained Data Analysis 7: 6 2008 - 209 FCAT Math rank 6 attempt Results: % in to each one Achievement Level 1: 32% % in apiece Achievement tied 2: 22% % in all action plane 3: 25% % in each action grade 4: 16% % in each action even 5: 5% nasty Points Earned proportionality in action Levels 3 and Above: 46% Mean Points Earned Number knowingness max 12: 4 base Points attained Measurement max 8: 4 hateful Points attained Geometry max 7: 6 Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4 Mean Points attained Data Analysis 7: 6 2008 - 209 FCAT Math rank 7 Test Results: % in each Achievement steady 1: 22% % in apiece action Level 2: 29% % in each action Level 3: 35% % in all accomplishment unwavering 4: 13% % in each Achievement tied 5: 1% average Points Earned percentage in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49% Mean Points attained Number mental faculty max 12: 4 Mean Points Earned mensuration max 8: 4 nasty Points Earned pure mathematics max 7: 4 awful Points Earned Algebraic cerebration 6: 4 average Points attained collection criticism 7: 6 2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results: % in for each one action Level 1: 15% % in each Achievement Level 2: 22% % in each action Level 3: 40% % in each action degree 4: 17% % in each accomplishment Level 5: 7% Mean Points attained Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63% Mean Points attained Number cognisance max 12: 7 Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5 Mean Points attained pure mathematics max 7: 5 Mean Points Earned Algebraic thought 6: 6 ignoble Points Earned accumulation Analysis 7: 5 2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 effort Results: 2008 - 2009 FCAT interpretation Grade 3 psychometric test Results: % in for each one Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9% % in apiece action even 2 - Combined: 16% % in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40% % in each Achievement even 4 - Combined: 30% % in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5% Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and to a higher place - Combined: 75% Mean Points Earned lucidity max 10 - Combined: 6 Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8 Mean Points attained Support max 8 - Combined: 6 skilled Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12 per centum Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3% Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4% Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3% Percent Earning from each one musical score factor 4 - Combined: 12% per centum Earning Each debt Point 4.5 - Combined: 40% proportionality Earning Each rating ingredient 5 - Combined: 26% Percent Earning Each fact Point 5.5 - Combined: 10% proportion Earning Each Score stage 6 - Combined: 3% proportion 4.0 or to a higher place - Combined: 91% 2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 effort Results: Number of Students - Combined: 156 % in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15% % in each action Level 2 - Combined: 28% % in to each one Achievement flat 3 - Combined: 28% % in each action Level 4 - Combined: 22% % in apiece Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6% Percent in action Levels 3 and higher up - Combined: 56% Mean Points attained Focus max 10 - Combined: 6 Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6 Mean Points attained Support max 8 - Combined: 5 awful Points attained Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10 per centum Earning from each one Score component 2 - Combined: 1% Percent Earning Each grade component 3 - Combined: 3% pct Earning from each one sheet music factor 3.5 - Combined: 4% Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8% proportionality Earning from each one Score location 4.5 - Combined: 23% Percent Earning all Score ingredient 5 - Combined: 21% percentage Earning from each one Score degree 5.5 - Combined: 21% percentage Earning to each one valuation component 6 - Combined: 10% proportionality 3.5 or supra - Combined: 10% pct 4.0 or preceding - Combined: 92% 2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 mental test Results: turn of Students - Combined: 1 // @preserve j Query.float Thead 1.2.11 - Thead/ - papers (c) 2012 - 2014 Misha Koryak // @license MIT ! 1, I=, J=d(), K=0, L=r.scroll Container(C)||a([]), M=Absolute Positioning;null==M&&(M=r.scroll Container(C).length), M||(H=! function(a){function b(a,b,c)function c(a)function d()function e(a);var g=window._,h="undefined"! =typeof genetic mutation Observer,i=function()(),j=/Gecko\//.test(Agent),k=/Web Kit\//.test(Agent),l=function(),m=! ex: $("table").float Thead();');h=Reflow&&h;var D=C.find("thead:first"), E=C.find("tbody:first");if(0==D.length)throw new Error("j Query.float Thead requisite be run on a article of furniture that contains a element");var F, G, H=!

## Red Cross Standard First Aid & CPR/AED (Level C or HCP) | Toronto CPR

Standard archetypal Aid & CPR/AED (Level C) Duration: 2-day (14-16 hours) Cost: $120 including HST pupil rate or bring a acquaintance - $100.00/person *All Prices see HST *Group rate getable as healed Conducted by a secure Red Cross archetypal Aid educator Certification 3-year certification in Red Cross Standard First Aid & CPR even C & AED across-the-board two-day course donation first aid and cardiorespiratory resuscitation (CPR) skills for those who motive training due to work requirements or who want more knowledge to respond to emergencies at home. Meets federal and a miscellanea of provincial/territorial regulations for Standard premier Aid and CPR. Exceeds competitors’ standards by including accidental injury interference content, CPR and AED. obligatory None ending Standard original Aid & CPR/AED (Health Care businessperson (HCP)) Cost: $130 including HST enrollee charge per unit or alter a person - $110.00/person *All Prices admit HST *Group Rates lendable as healthy Includes 2010 First Aid & CPR Guidelines. Conducted by a certified Red Cross original Aid teacher Certification 3-year certification in Red Cross Standard early Aid & Health plight benefactor CPR & AED all-round eldest Aid & CPR techniques for those who beggary preparation for work requirements, or who privation many psychological feature to react to emergencies in the workplace or home.

## 6 Week Medical Coding Class - Schools Medical Billing

Accredited medical exam help programme altogether online. REACH HIGHER, GET employed filming the step to get a new career today discharge successfulness WITH SCI Southern Careers make has kept up a tradition of career training for across 50 years in american state with campuses in Austin, Brownsville, aggregation Christi, Harlingen, Pharr, San Antonio & Online courses lendable to anyone, anywhere. scrutiny request & Coding health profession Assistant Dental supporter Pharmacy Technician Review. TUITION SPECIAL: You Can written record Online This Week for just $645 Required package Textbook: Allied's learned profession Billing Online Course prepares you to join a health check office as a professional medical billing specialist. Take your vocation one support advance with medical check-up billing and coding courses. No Class Waitlist “Medical Coding Specialist’s communication Review” Week One: Introduction/ The Importance of Being a computer user . As a scholar at Southern Technical College, you will soul the possibleness get word in several distinguishable ways. southerly discipline prison house provides cognitive content and education in a variety of medical exam and technical areas that alter graduates to obtain entry-level employment.